Okay, so I've almost never posted on this forum, but this feels like one occasion that I feel the need to speak up.
Steam's reviewing system is clearly more aimed toward people finding other people's reviews "Helpful", as opposed to the amount of Positive reviews vs. the Negative. Currently, the ratio of such is 937 to 138, where Positive reviews are winning.
To put this in perspective, I believe this is where the trusting of people's opinion is a load of BS, because of Steam's interpretation of valid opinions. I say this because there is no mental component to clicking "Yes" to its helpfulness, as opposed to...I don't know...putting effort to making a valid review of said product. It doesn't help that the amount of effort put into the game from the Negative reviewers are around the range of 1-2 hours...seriously.
I don't want to sound like this biased apologist for Scott Cawthon or anything, but I think it becomes a little more clear by the second that the antagonism seems less factual and constructive and more about whatever else may be attributed to simply having some fraction of distaste toward Scott himself. It's like I am biased, but at least I have something to prove that FNaF World is probably not as bad as the internet is making it out to be. If it's not Steam's piss poor review system, it's the comment section of Youtube. Again, same old system where people high five each other as they say non-constructive things like "LOL, what's next? FNaF Pachinko?"
Honestly, I don't want to be the guy saying there's some anti-Scott mindset...except that I have seen someone despise him the very minute there was information stating that he's Christian. There was no valid reason to have that distaste, especially when nothing in his dialogue indicates he's the next Doug TenNapel.
Anyway, feel free to correct me if my information/stance is wrong. Pardon my overblown passion, if need be.
